Civil judgment of Chancheng District People's Court, Foshan City, Guangdong Province

    Chancheng District People's Court, Foshan City, Guangdong Province

    Written judgment of civil affairs

    (2017) Yue 0604, Early Republic of China No. 132

    Plaintiff: Opai Home Furnishing Group Co., LTD., No. 366, Guanghua 3rd Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province. Unified social credit code ××97C.

    Legal representative: Yao Liangsong, chairman of the board.

    Attorney: Zhai Mingyue, lawyer of Shandong Changping Law Firm.

    Agent AD litem: Wang Ning, lawyer of Shandong Changping Law Firm.

    Defendant: Liu Yufang, female, Han Nationality, born on April 8, 1988, residing in Huaibin County, Henan Province.

    Defendant: Foshan Jiujiu Hong Huwei Technology Co., LTD., 8th Floor, No. 112, Outer Ring Road, Shunde High-tech Zone (Ronggui), Ronggui Huaguo Neighborhood Committee, Shunde District, Foshan City, Guangdong Province. Registration number 440681000532109.

    Legal representative: Zhang Biao, manager.

    Plaintiff opie household group co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as the European group) Liu Yufang v. the defendant, the defendant nine to nine red hutch defends technology co., LTD. Foshan city (hereinafter referred to as nine nine red hutch defends companies) the infringement trademark rights and unfair competition disputes, in our hospital on January 4, 2017 to begin, form a collegial panel in accordance with the law, on April 24, 2017 in open trial, plaintiffs opie group of entrusted agent wang ning to appear in court to participate in the litigation. The defendant Liu Yufang and the defendant Nine red kitchen company were not legally summoned to the court. The case is now closed.

    1. Request to be ordered that defendant Liu Yufang immediately stop infringing upon the plaintiff's trademark right by using the words "European" in the online store name and website; 2. Request judgment against Defendant Liu Yufang for immediately ceasing the sale of a range hood with the words "OPAICN" and "OPAICN with love"; 3. Request for judgment and order the defendant Foshan Jiujiu Hong Huwei Technology Co., Ltd. to immediately stop producing and selling the range hood with the words "OPAICN" and "OPAICN". 4. Request to order the two defendants to compensate the plaintiff for economic losses and reasonable expenses for safeguarding their rights in this case, totaling RMB 200,000 only; 5. Request to order the two defendants to bear the costs of the case.

    Facts and reason: the plaintiff is 11 classes, "European" and "OPPEIN" registered trademark, the plaintiff since its inception, after decades of operation, has been "Europe" casting become household names, as is known to all of the country's household, electrical appliances, sanitary ware brand, the brand has won the "Chinese famous brand", "China well-known trademark", such as reputation, in the public mind, "Europe" has become not only the plaintiff products and on behalf of the symbol of the enterprise name, also become the instructions of the plaintiff and the plaintiff associated enterprises significant recognition of market main body and the sources of identity. In November 2016, the plaintiff found the defendant Liu Yufang in "taobao" shop name, web page extensive use of "Europe", "guangdong" text, oil absorption products in the product's packaging, manuals and other carrier was labeled "OPAICN", "the home has love OPAICN", "foshan city nine nine red hutch defends electric technology co., LTD.". The plaintiff entrusts the notary office to preserve the evidence of the above behavior. To sum up, the plaintiff believes that the aforesaid actions of the two defendants not only infringe upon the plaintiff's right to exclusive use of the registered trademark, but also violate the principle of good faith and recognized business ethics and constitute unfair competition. In order to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the plaintiff, the plaintiff, in accordance with the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China, the Law of the People's Republic of China against Unfair Competition and other relevant provisions, appealed to the court to make a fair judgment in accordance with the law.

    To prove the claim, the plaintiff provides the court with the following evidence:

    1. (2016) The Notarial Certificate of Lai Feng City Certificate No. 347 certifies that the plaintiff has the exclusive right to use the registered trademark No. 4378572.

    (2016) Laifengcheng Notarial Certificate No. 350 certifies that the plaintiff has the exclusive right to use the registered trademark No. 1128213.

    (2016) Laifengcheng Notarial Certificate No. 346 certifies that the plaintiff has the exclusive right to use the registered trademark No. 1137521.

    (2016) The Notarial certificate no. 348 of Laifeng City Certificate certifies that the plaintiff has the exclusive right to use the registered trademark No. 7731876.

    (2016) The Legal notarial certificate no. 352 issued by Laofengcheng testifies that the plaintiff legally owns the copyright of "" fine art fonts. This work, created on August 10, 1996, is completely consistent with the contents of the registered trademarks No. 4378572, 1128213 and 1137521 of the plaintiff, and also proves that the plaintiff's" "brand has certain originality and a long history.

    The trademark [2009] No. 7 issued by the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce proves that the registered trademark "" no. 1128213 enjoyed by the plaintiff had been recognized as a well-known trademark by the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce on April 24, 2009.

    (2016) laifengcheng certificate no. 353 notarial certificate :(1) "China famous brand product certificate" issued by the general administration of quality supervision, inspection and quarantine on July 9, 2007; (2) "Guangdong Famous Brand Product" certificate issued by Guangdong Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision in October 2008; (3) The "Guangdong Famous Trademark Certificate" issued by guangdong Famous Trademark Recognition Committee in February 2008 proves that the registered trademark No. 1128213 was recognized as a Famous trademark of Guangdong Province in March 2005 and February 2008 respectively; (4) In December 2012, China building decoration Association kitchen and sanitation engineering committee issued by the plaintiff in 2012 was named "2012 Chinese kitchen and sanitation 100", "overall kitchen leading enterprises top 10" certificate; (5) The Certificate of Honor issued by guangzhou Municipal People's Government in September 2013; (6) Certificate issued by Brand Watch magazine on December 28, 2014; (7) In January 2015, the plaintiff issued by Guangdong Provincial Home Industry Federation and Guangdong Furniture Chamber of Commerce was awarded the honor certificate of "Top 10 Most Valuable Brands" in 2014; (8) Certificate of honor issued by Guangdong Provincial Home Industry Federation and Guangdong Furniture Chamber of Commerce in January 2015.

    (2016) laifengcheng certificate no. 357 notarial certificate :(1) the tax payment certificate issued by the national bureau of taxation in baiyun district, guangzhou no. 100014, certifying that the plaintiff paid taxes to the bureau on January 1, 2013 solstice on December 31, 2013, which was fourteen hundred thousand four hundred and seventy-nine thousand five hundred and thirty-three point seven. (2) the tax payment certificate no. [2014]100579 issued by the state tax bureau of baiyun district, guangzhou, certifying that the plaintiff paid tax on January 1, 2014 solstice on June 30, 2014 to the tax bureau seven thousand five hundred and ninety-nine thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine yuan nine cents. (3) the tax payment certificate no. [2015] no. 100174 issued by the national bureau of taxation in baiyun district, guangzhou, certifying that the plaintiff paid tax at nine thousand five hundred and nine thousand one hundred and twenty-two yuan sixty-eight cents to the bureau on July 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014. (4) the tax payment certificate no. [2015] no. 101552 issued by the state tax bureau of baiyun district, guangzhou, certifying that the plaintiff paid tax on January 1, 2015 solstice on June 30, 2015 to the tax bureau seven thousand five hundred and twenty-two thousand six hundred and sixty-seven point four. (5) the tax payment certificate no. [2016]100274 issued by the state tax bureau of baiyun district, guangzhou, certifying that the plaintiff paid a tax of twelve million two hundred and thirty-six hundred sixty-seven yuan nine cents to the tax bureau on July 1, 2015. (6) notice no. 00000724 issued by the tax administration bureau of large enterprises of guangzhou local tax bureau certifies that the plaintiff paid tax of four thousand two hundred and two hundred and ninety nine thousand two hundred and seventy-eight yuan eighty six cents to the bureau on January 1, 2014. (7) notice no. 00001248 issued by the tax administration bureau of large enterprises of guangzhou local tax bureau certifies that the plaintiff paid tax on July 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014 to the bureau, i.e., 36,558,999 yuan and seventy-two cents. (8) notice no. 00003448 issued by the tax administration of large enterprises of guangzhou local tax bureau certifies that the plaintiff paid tax of four thousand two million four hundred and twenty-seven thousand one hundred and forty cents to the bureau on June 30, 2015 on January 1, 2015. (9) notice no. 00004591 issued by the tax administration bureau of large enterprises of guangzhou local tax bureau certifies that the plaintiff paid tax twenty thousand nine hundred and eighty-one thousand nine hundred and thirty-three yuan forty seven to the bureau on July 1, 2015.

    9. (2016) The Notarial Certificate no. 354 of Leifeng City Certificate proves the audit department's audit of the profits obtained by the plaintiff by using the brand "OPPEIN" and "OPPEIN", which proves the high value of the brand "OPPEIN" and "OPPEIN".

    10, (2016), lai FengCheng card people word no. 355 is notarial deed, prove that the plaintiff by CCTV, hunan TV's "European brand" for the continuous publicity, specific content as follows: (1), October 30, 2012, the plaintiff and the Beijing international advertising co., LTD. Signed on time boiling "swap space" domestic outfit funded 2013 cooperation agreement, this agreement is agreed on January 5, 2013 to December 28, 2013, 2 sets in CCTV's "exchange space" brand publicity the plaintiff, advertising is wubai suhuang ten thousand yuan. (2), in July 2014, the plaintiff with hunan, hunan radio and television advertising corporation downwind media television project advertising co., LTD. Signed a contract, the contract on September 28, 2014 to November 12, 2014, in hunan TV's 10th golden eagle festival closing ceremony and awards section is relevant to the plaintiff, brand advertising for above ten thousand yuan. (3) on November 6, 2013, the TV advertisement release contract signed by the plaintiff and zhejiang zhimei auto advertising co., LTD., which stipulates that the plaintiff's brand shall be publicized on CCTV news channel on January 1, 2014 and the advertising fee shall be four thousand four hundred and sixty-three thousand nine hundred and seventy yuan. (4) on November 27, 2014, the sponsorship and cooperation agreement of 2015 "exchange space" home decoration fund signed by the plaintiff and Beijing ontime boiling international advertising co., LTD. The agreement agreed that on April 4, 2015 solstice on March 26, 2016, the plaintiff's brand would be promoted in the second set of "exchange space" column of CCTV, and the advertising fee would be six million yuan. (5) on October 22, 2014, the advertising agency contract signed by the plaintiff and kashgar yinsong culture media co., LTD., the agreement provides that on January 1, 2015, solstice, December 31, 2015, the advertising fee of the plaintiff shall be twenty-three million nine hundred and seventy thousand yuan for promoting the plaintiff's brand on the CCTV news channel.

    11. (2016) The Notarial Certificate no. 356 issued by Lifeng City Certificate, which proves that the plaintiff spent a huge amount of money to hire the star Jiang Wenli to speak for "Europa" products, which further proves that the plaintiff spent a huge amount of money to promote Europa brand.

    April 12, 2011, 21, 22, 25, 26, 28, 29, "linchuan evening news", published on August 26, 2011 issue of the "shenzhen special zone signs up for", on September 20, 2011, published on September 30, anqing daily, published in September 2010 years of the ambry in Shanghai ", published in June 2011, the sales and marketing management edition, published in April 2011 "ruili household", published in April 2014, decorate world magazine, prove that the plaintiff by the print media publicity, "European brand", It also proves that the plaintiff's original advertising slogan of "family, love and Europe" continues to use and publicize. The second group of evidence proves that the plaintiff's trademark has been widely known and well-known by the public.

    13. (2016) The notarial Certificate no. 3789 (including the infringing material object sealed by the notary office), proving the infringement facts of the defendant.

    14. One notarization fee bill, amount fee 25000 yuan, this case claims 500 yuan. To prove the plaintiff's reasonable expenses.

    If the defendant does not appear in court or submit evidence, he shall be deemed to have waived his right to produce evidence, to dialectically and to cross-examine evidence.

    The court recognizes the authenticity of the evidence provided by the plaintiff as the basis for ascertaining the facts of the case.

    The defendant Liu Yufang and the defendant Nine red kitchen company did not submit a defense opinion.

    On the basis of admissible evidence and the parties' statements, the Court ascertained and confirmed the following facts:

    (I) Opie Group, founded on July 1, 1994, is a joint-stock company engaged in furniture manufacturing.

    On June 7, 2007, guangzhou opie ambry enterprise co., LTD., by the state administration for industry and commerce trademark office (hereinafter referred to as the trademark bureau) for approval the registration no. 4378572 "European" registered trademark, shall use commodities for 11 class gas furnace, microwave oven (kitchenware), electric cooker, baking equipment, cooking utensils, faucets, bathroom equipment, disinfect cupboard, water filter, basin of wash one's hands and sanitary equipment (components), steam bath, sitz bath tub and shower equipment, in the rain compartment, wash tub, sit implement, kitchen smoke lampblack machine machine, lamp (as), Registration is valid from June 7, 2007 to June 6, 2017. Then the name of the registrant of the trademark is changed to Opai Home Furnishing Group Co., LTD.

    On December 21, 1997, guangzhou kang jie kitchen equipment co., LTD., approved by the trademark office registered no. 1137521, "European" trademark, shall use commodities for 11 class kitchen stove, gas stove, electric cooker, cooker, refrigeration equipment, drying equipment, hot and cold water filter, beverage cooling equipment, electric water bottles, refrigeration container, since December 21, 1997, valid until December 20, 2007. Then the trademark was approved by the Industrial and Commercial Bureau and extended to December 20, 2017, and the name of the trademark registrant was changed to Opai Home Furnishing Group Co., LTD.

    In September 2007, Opai cabinet products were rated as China's famous brand by the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine. In October 2008, Opai cabinet products were rated as guangdong famous brand products by Guangdong Quality Supervision Bureau. In February 2008, the plaintiff's trademark no. 1128213 "Opai" was a famous trademark of Guangdong Province on the sideboard and was ×× ×. On April 24, 2009, the trademark "Opai" on the category 20 sideboard goods of the plaintiff was identified as a well-known trademark by the Trademark Office.

    (II) On November 12, 2016, wang Shouzhen, the authorized agent of the plaintiff, applied for evidence preservation to Luxi Notary Office of Liaocheng City, Shandong Province. On November 14, 2016 in the notarial personnel, under the supervision of 13 shou-zhen wang in guangzhou baiyun district and the town and street "7 days inn" notarization to connect the Internet computer operation, for "wl5355021061" in "taobao" shopkeeper "opie kitchen electric flagship store in order for the" European fine kitchen range hood "one, order number 2679615089424885, orders generated after the show the nickname" wl5355021061 "real name for the case the defendant Liu Yufang. On November 16, 2016, in the notarial personnel, under the supervision of 13 shou-zhen wang in guangzhou baiyun district and the town and street "7 days inn" signed "gravels express Courier delivered the lobby of the outer packing in good condition, with the wording" there's a have love OPAICN OPAICN "of a goods, single number is" 6310686167 ", shou-zhen wang will be open for the above goods, there is a range hood a, manuals, warranty CARDS, a piece of toilet paper, shou-zhen wang photos of these items, then notarial personnel with notarization seals to seal of the above items, Deliver sealed items and logistics documents to Wang Shouzhen for safekeeping. On November 19, 2016, Wang Shouzhen confirmed the receipt of the order no. 2679615089424885 on Taobao.com while operating the Internet computer connected to the Notary office at 7 Days Chain Hotel, No. 13 renhe Street, Renhe Town, Baiyun District, Guangzhou. Shandong Liaocheng Luxi Notary Office supervised the whole process and issued the notarial certificate no. 3789 (2016).

    In trial, accuser opened the product that afore-mentioned notarization bought in court, accuser charges the tort product of this case is smoke lampblack machine. The plaintiff believes that the front and rear sides of the packaging box of the accused product are marked with the logo of "OPAICN" and "OPAICN with love". The company name, address, telephone number and service hotline of the defendant Jiujiu Red Kitchen and bathroom company are marked on the left and right sides; The OPAICN and OPAICN OPAICN are on the cover of the OPAICN. The OPAICN machine is marked with the OPAICN and the OPAICN logo of "A OPAICN with love". The outer packing box is marked with the OPAICN and the OPAICN logo of "a OPAICN with love".

    In the trial, the plaintiff made it clear that the alleged trademark infringement was the infringement of the plaintiff's trademark No. 4378572 and no. 1137521 by the defendant Liu Yufang's use of the word "Opai" on the online store's page. The OPAICN and OPAICN products were manufactured and sold by defendant Jiujiu Red Huwei Co., LTD., with the OPAICN and OPAICN logos.

    (III) On July 20, 2013, the plaintiff Opai Group signed the Advertising Contract Renewal with Jiang Wenli, agreeing to invite Jiang Wenli to perform for the advertising production of cabinets, wardrobes and bathroom products produced by the plaintiff Opai Group. Subsequently, the plaintiff Opai Group used the advertisement containing Jiang Wenli's image in some magazines and newspapers in China, and also used the propaganda words of "There is a family, there is love and there is Opai".

    The court holds that this case is a case of infringement of the right to exclusive use of trademarks and improper disputes. Combined with the plaintiff's allegations, the Court makes the following comments:

    Whether the defendant Liu Yufang has violated the plaintiff's right to exclusive use of the registered trademark No. 4378572 and No. 1137521. The plaintiff accused The defendant, Liu Yufang, of trademark infringement by using the word "Opai" on his online sales store. First of all, the defendant Liu Yufang used on its sales store "opie kitchen electric flagship" and "opie fine kitchen range hood", the word "European" not highlight use, not play a role of trademark recognition, thus the defendant Liu Yufang used on sale online store "opie kitchen electric flagship" and "opie fine kitchen range hood", does not constitute a trademark infringement.

    Ii. Whether the two defendants conduct unfair competition.

    The plaintiff claims that defendant Liu Yufang's sale and the use of "OPAICN" and "OPAICN with a OPAICN OPAICN" in the products produced and sold by defendant Jiujiu Hong Huwei Co., LTD constitute unfair competition behaviors. Article 2, Paragraph 1, of the Law against Unfair competition stipulates that in market transactions, operators shall follow the principles of voluntariness, equality, fairness, good faith and abide by generally recognized business ethics. Article 9 The first paragraph stipulates that an operator shall not, by advertising or other means, falsely publicize the quality, sufficiency, performance, use, producer, term of validity or place of origin of the commodity, which is misleading.

    The business scope of the plaintiff opie group for furniture manufacturing, in September 2007, European brand of ambry of products by the state administration of quality supervision, inspection and quarantine rated as China famous brand product, in October 2008, European brand ambry products by quality supervision bureau of guangdong province famous brand products of guangdong province, in February 2008, the plaintiff's 1128213th "European" trademark in the sideboard, is x x x x for famous trademarks of guangdong province, on April 24, 2009, the plaintiff on the sideboard commodity 20 "European" brand were identified as the famous trademark, the trademark office so we decided that after many years of product sales and advertising, The cabinet products produced and sold by the plaintiff have higher popularity in the relevant public. Although the plaintiff was once identified as a well-known trademark, it was not the trademark involved in this case, but because the name of the plaintiff was also "Europa", the good goodwill carried by the trademark of "Europa" was inseparable with the enterprise, and it was unquestionable that the logo of "Europa" had established a specific connection with the plaintiff. Defendant Nine nine red kitchen and sanitation company accused of infringement products for the range hood, generally used in the kitchen, usually embedded in the cabinet to form a whole, so accused of infringement range hood products and the plaintiff's cabinet products have a certain correlation, the defendant nine nine red kitchen and sanitation company and the plaintiff has a competitive relationship. According to find out the fact that the plaintiff is used in the advertisement "have family love the pie", and hired star "jiang wenli" as a propaganda image spokesperson, the defendant nine to nine red hutch is defended the company's products packaging were used in the "OPAICN" and "have a home with love OPAICN", so the subjective malicious clings to the plaintiff's reputation is very obvious, also known as "fake", the defendant nine nine red hutch defends companies to relevant consumer confusion and mistakes, improperly obtaining competitive advantage, in violation of fair and honest credit and the principle of fair competition, has constituted unfair competition. The defendant, Liu Yufang, sold the alleged infringing products and used the words "European Kitchen Electronics Brand Shop" and "European Kitchen range hood" on his online store, which was also intended to create confusion and misidentification among relevant consumers and constituted unfair competition.

    The civil liabilities to be borne by the two defendants.

    According to Article 118 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China, a citizen or legal person whose right to exclusive use of a registered trademark has been infringed upon shall have the right to demand that the infringement be stopped and that the loss be compensated for. The plaintiff sues the defendant Liu Yufang, nine nine red kitchen and sanitary company to stop the trademark infringement and the unfair competition behavior, the court supports.

    On the issue of the determination of the amount of compensation in this case. According to the provisions of The first and third paragraphs of Article 63 of the Trademark Law, "The amount of compensation for the infringement of the exclusive right to use a trademark shall be determined according to the actual losses suffered by the right holder due to the infringement; Where the actual loss is difficult to determine, it may be determined in accordance with the profits the infringer has gained from the infringement; Where it is difficult to determine the losses of the right holder or the profits of the infringer, a reasonable multiple of the licensing fee for the trademark shall be determined by reference to the said trademark. If it is difficult to determine the actual losses suffered by the obligee as a result of the infringement, the interests gained by the infringer as a result of the infringement, or the licensing fee of the registered trademark, the people's court shall, in light of the circumstances of the infringing act, make a judgment to compensate the obligee not more than THREE million yuan ". At the same time, article 20 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law stipulates that if a business operator violates the provisions of this Law and causes damage to the injured business operator, it shall be liable for damages. The Supreme People's Court on the trial of civil cases of unfair competition "the explanation of application of law in article 17 of the regulation:" determined in article 5 of the anti-unfair competition law, article 9, article 14 of the regulation of damage compensation of ACTS of unfair competition, can consult to determine the use of a registered trademark infringement damage compensation method ". The two defendants in this case constitute unfair competition. The actual loss the plaintiff to the case and the defendant's illegal gains are not sure, we consider the reputation of the plaintiff's popularity, the infringement of the defendant's subjective intent, plot, business scale, is accused of infringement product sales, and other factors, Liu Yufang control-determine the defendant to the plaintiff compensation for the economic loss of 40000 yuan, the defendant nine nine red hutch defends companies compensate the plaintiff for the economic loss of 100000 yuan, the compensation has been including reasonable expense for the rights to the case.

    In conclusion, according to paragraph 1 of article 3 of the "trademark law of the People's Republic of China", article 57, paragraph 1 of article sixty-three, paragraph 3, the anti-unfair competition law of the People's Republic of China, the first paragraph of article 2, article 9, article 20, the Supreme People's Court on some issues of applicable law in trademark civil dispute cases interpretation articles 9, 10 and 16, the civil procedure law of the People's Republic of China, the provisions of article one hundred and forty-four of the of the first paragraph of article sixty-four, judgment by default is as follows:

    As of the effective date of this judgment, defendant Liu Yufang immediately stopped his unfair competition actions against the plaintiff, Opai Household Products Co., LTD., by using the advertising slogan of "Opai" "OPAICN" and "OPAICN" in the sales website and the products' packaging and instructions.

    Second, foshan city, the defendant nine to nine red hutch defends technology co., LTD. Since the day of the enforcement of this decision immediately stop the infringement of the plaintiff opie household group co., LTD., ACTS of unfair competition, is to stop smoking in the production and sales of suction machine products, product packaging, manuals, etc. To use the "European" "OPAICN" and "the home has love OPAICN" words of advertising language;

    3. Within 10 days from the effective date of this judgment, Defendant Liu Yufang shall indemnify the plaintiff, Europa Home Furnishing Group Co., LTD., for the economic loss of RMB 40,000 yuan (including, but not limited to, the reasonable expenses incurred by the plaintiff, Europa Home Furnishing Group Co., LTD., to stop the infringement in this case);

    Four, the defendant nine to nine red hutch defends technology co., LTD. Foshan city within 10 days from the date of this decision, compensate the plaintiff European household group co., LTD., economic loss of 100000 yuan (the plaintiff is included in the European furniture group co., LTD. To stop this case any reasonable expense incurred by the torts, including the notarial fees, legal fees, investigation expenses, etc., but not limited to);

    V. Rejecting other claims of the plaintiff opai Furniture Group Co., LTD.

    If defendant Liu Yufang and Defendant Foshan Jiujiu Hong Huwei Technology Co., Ltd. fail to perform their pecunial obligations within the period specified in this judgment, they shall, in accordance with Article 253 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, pay double interest on the debt for the delayed period.

    The handling fee of this case is 4,300 yuan, 860 yuan borne by defendant Liu Yufang, 2,150 yuan borne by defendant Foshan Jiujiu Hong Huwei Technology Co., Ltd. and 1,290 yuan borne by plaintiff Opai Household Group Co., LTD.

    If you are not satisfied with this judgment, you may, within 15 days from the date of serving the judgment, file an appeal to the court, and make a copy according to the number of the other party, and appeal to the Intermediate People's Court of Foshan, Guangdong.

    Chief Judge Wu Zhanhong

    People's Juror Ho Wing Chun

    People's Juror Ho Shao-li

    May 10, 2017

    Clerk Yan Yongyu